Dismantling The Effective Strategy of PGMI INSIP Learning Media In Increasing Interest In Learning Social Sciences
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59944/jipsi.v5i1.898Keywords:
Social Sciences, Learning Media, PGMIAbstract
Interest in learning is one of the determining factors for students' success in understanding Social Sciences courses in the PGMI Study Program. The purpose of the research is to analyse the condition of PGMI INSIP students' learning interests in Social Sciences courses. And identify the types of learning media that lecturers have been using in lectures. This study uses a qualitative approach with a descriptive case study. The sample consisted of 3 lecturers teaching Social Sciences courses, 12 PGMI students in semesters 2, 4, and 6, 1 Head of PGMI Study Program, and 1 Administrative Staff. The main instrument in qualitative research is the researcher himself (human instrument). To support data collection, auxiliary instruments were used in the form of Observation Guidelines, Semi-Structured Interview Guidelines, Documentation, and Field Notes. It is used by researchers to record important phenomena during the study. Data analysis uses the Miles, Huberman, and Saldana models, through the stages of Data Reduction, Data Presentation (Data Display), and Conclusion Drawn. The results of the study show that the effective strategy of learning media at PGMI INSIP lies in the use of interactive, visual, collaborative, and digital technology-based media such as Canva, Quizizz, learning videos, and digital social case studies. This study found that PGMI INSIP students are more interested in learning that combines visual elements, group discussions, gamification, and the relationship of the material with social realities in society. This research contributes in the form of a conceptual model of learning media strategies for the PGMI Study Program in increasing students' interest in learning in Social Sciences courses.
References
Agbo, F. J., Olaleye, S. A., Bower, M., & Oyelere, S. S. (2023). Examining the relationships between students’ perceptions of technology, pedagogy, and cognition: the case of immersive virtual reality mini games to foster computational thinking in higher education. Smart Learning Environments, 10(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00233-1
Al-Rahmi, A. M., Shamsuddin, A., Wahab, E., Al-Rahmi, W. M., Alyoussef, I. Y., & Crawford, J. (2022). Social media use in higher education: Building a structural equation model for student satisfaction and performance. Frontiers in Public Health, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.1003007
Ali, B., & Dahlhaus, P. (2022). Roles of Selective Agriculture Practices in Sustainable Agricultural Performance: A Systematic Review. Sustainability, 14(6), 3185. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14063185
Amirullah. (2015). Metode Penelitian Manajemen. Bayumedia Publishing.
An, F., Xi, L., & Yu, J. (2024). The relationship between technology acceptance and self-regulated learning: the mediation roles of intrinsic motivation and learning engagement. Education and Information Technologies, 29(3), 2605–2623. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11959-3
Aroonsrimarakot, S., Laiphrakpam, M., Chathiphot, P., Saengsai, P., & Prasri, S. (2023). RETRACTED ARTICLE: Online learning challenges in Thailand and strategies to overcome the challenges from the students’ perspectives. Education and Information Technologies, 28(7), 8153–8170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11530-6
Arvidsson Segerkvist, K., Hansson, H., Sonesson, U., & Gunnarsson, S. (2021). A Systematic Mapping of Current Literature on Sustainability at Farm-Level in Beef and Lamb Meat Production. Sustainability, 13(5), 2488. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052488
Awidi, I. T., & Paynter, M. (2024). An Evaluation of the Impact of Digital Technology Innovations on Students’ Learning: Participatory Research Using a Student-Centred Approach. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 29(1), 65–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-022-09619-5
Barrot, J. S., Llenares, I. I., & del Rosario, L. S. (2021). Students’ online learning challenges during the pandemic and how they cope with them: The case of the Philippines. Education and Information Technologies, 26(6), 7321–7338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10589-x
Brosens, L., Raes, A., Octavia, J. R., & Emmanouil, M. (2023). How future proof is design education? A systematic review. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 33(2), 663–683. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-022-09743-4
Bryant, P. (2023). Student experience and digital storytelling: Integrating the authentic interaction of students work, life, play and learning into the co-design of university teaching practices. Education and Information Technologies, 28(11), 14051–14069. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11566-8
Campos-Mesa, M.-C., Castañeda-Vázquez, C., DelCastillo-Andrés, Ó., & González-Campos, G. (2022). Augmented Reality and the Flipped Classroom—A Comparative Analysis of University Student Motivation in Semi-Presence-Based Education Due to COVID-19: A Pilot Study. Sustainability, 14(4), 2319. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14042319
Cavanagh, T. M., & Kiersch, C. (2023). Using commonly-available technologies to create online multimedia lessons through the application of the Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 71(3), 1033–1053. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-022-10181-1
Çeken, B., & Taşkın, N. (2022). Multimedia learning principles in different learning environments: a systematic review. Smart Learning Environments, 9(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-022-00200-2
Cheung, S. K. S., Wang, F. L., & Kwok, L. F. (2021). The Continuous Pursuit of Smart Learning. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 37(2), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.7207
Cukurbasi, B., & Kiyici, M. (2021). Instructional design and instructional effectiveness in virtual classrooms: Research trends and challenges. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 156–174. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.6882
Esteve‐Mon, F. M., Postigo‐Fuentes, A. Y., & Castañeda, L. (2023). A strategic approach of the crucial elements for the implementation of digital tools and processes in higher education. Higher Education Quarterly, 77(3), 558–573. https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12411
Fazia, T., Bubbico, F., Nova, A., Buizza, C., Cela, H., Iozzi, D., Calgan, B., Maggi, F., Floris, V., Sutti, I., Bruno, S., Ghilardi, A., & Bernardinelli, L. (2023). Improving stress management, anxiety, and mental well-being in medical students through an online Mindfulness-Based Intervention: a randomized study. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 8214. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-35483-z
Fernández-Rodríguez, C. A., Arenas-Fenollar, M. C., Lacruz-Pérez, I., & Tárraga-Mínguez, R. (2023). Teaching Methods in Medical Education: An Analysis of the Assessments and Preferences of Students. Sustainability, 15(11), 9044. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15119044
Garcia-Mila, M., Miralda-Banda, A., Luna, J., Remesal, A., Castells, N., & Gilabert, S. (2021). Change in Classroom Dialogicity to Promote Cultural Literacy across Educational Levels. Sustainability, 13(11), 6410. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116410
Ginzburg, T., & Barak, M. (2023). Technology-Enhanced Learning and Its Association with Motivation to Learn Science from a Cross-Cultural Perspective. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 32(4), 597–606. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-023-10048-x
Heilporn, G., Lakhal, S., & Bélisle, M. (2021). An examination of teachers’ strategies to foster student engagement in blended learning in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00260-3
Ho, C.-H., Zhang, H., Li, J., & Zhang, M. (2023). Development and Application of Interactive Teaching Systems for Online Design Courses. International Journal of Distance Education Technologies, 21(2), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijdet.317365
Holman, D., & Švejdarová, E. (2023). The 21st-Century Empowering Wholeness Adaptive (EWA) Educational Model Transforming Learning Capacity and Human Capital through Wholeness Systems Thinking towards a Sustainable Future. Sustainability, 15(2), 1301. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15021301
Hoque, F., Yasin, R. M., & Sopian, K. (2022). Revisiting Education for Sustainable Development: Methods to Inspire Secondary School Students toward Renewable Energy. Sustainability, 14(14), 8296. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148296
Jiang, M., Lam, A. H. C., Chiu, D. K. W., & Ho, K. K. W. (2023). Social media aids for business learning: A quantitative evaluation with the 5E instructional model. Education and Information Technologies, 28(9), 12269–12291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11690-z
Kannan, V., Warriem, J. M., Majumdar, R., & Ogata, H. (2022). Learning dialogs orchestrated with BookRoll: effects on engagement and learning in an undergraduate physics course. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 17(1), 28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-022-00203-0
Kozanitis, A., & Nenciovici, L. (2023). Effect of active learning versus traditional lecturing on the learning achievement of college students in humanities and social sciences: a meta-analysis. Higher Education, 86(6), 1377–1394. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00977-8
Lansing-Stoeffler, K., & Daley, N. (2023). Navigating the Spectrum of Conventionality: Toward a New Model of Creative Thinking. Journal of Intelligence, 11(2), 21. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence11020021
Lexy J. Moleong. (2006). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Liu, C., Wang, L., Pi, Z., & Yang, J. (2024). Interaction matters: Co-viewing facilitates learning from live video streaming for elementary students. Education and Information Technologies, 29(2), 2387–2411. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11920-4
López-Martínez, A., Meroño, L., Cánovas-López, M., García-de-Alcaraz, A., & Martínez-Aranda, L. M. (2022). Using Gamified Strategies in Higher Education: Relationship between Intrinsic Motivation and Contextual Variables. Sustainability, 14(17), 11014. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141711014
Maluenda-Albornoz, J., Berríos-Riquelme, J., Infante-Villagrán, V., & Lobos-Peña, K. (2022). Perceived Social Support and Engagement in First-Year Students: The Mediating Role of Belonging during COVID-19. Sustainability, 15(1), 597. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010597
Mason, L., Tarchi, C., Ronconi, A., Manzione, L., Latini, N., & Bråten, I. (2022). Do medium and Context Matter when learning from multiple complementary Digital texts and videos? Instructional Science, 50(5), 653–679. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-022-09591-8
Meehan, M., & Howard, E. (2024). The university mathematics lecture: to record, or not to record, that is the question. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 36(2), 285–310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-023-00444-2
Memon, M. Q., Lu, Y., Memon, A. R., Memon, A., Munshi, P., & Shah, S. F. A. (2022). Does the Impact of Technology Sustain Students’ Satisfaction, Academic and Functional Performance: An Analysis via Interactive and Self-Regulated Learning? Sustainability, 14(12), 7226. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14127226
Miles, M. B. & Huberman, M. (1992). Analisis Data Kualitatif. Universitas Indonesia Press.
Milla, D., Zulkipli, Z., Sahar, A., Reliubun, A. S., & Amri, H. (2024). Penerapan Teknologi Pendidikan: Menghadapi Kendala, Menciptakan Solusi. Indo-MathEdu Intellectuals Journal, 5(6), 7416–7425. https://doi.org/10.54373/imeij.v5i6.2109
Mohammed, Y. B., & Ozdamli, F. (2021). Motivational Effects of Gamification Apps in Education: A Systematic Literature Review. BRAIN. BROAD RESEARCH IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND NEUROSCIENCE, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.18662/brain/12.2/196
Moleong, L. J. (2007). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Morris-Eyton, H., & Pretorius, E. (2023). Cultivating a Digital Promise: Promoting Reflective and Reflexive Activities to Enhance Self-Directed Learning for the 21st Century. Student Success, 14(1), 88–99. https://doi.org/10.5204/ssj.2659
Mubaidilla, I. A. (2025). Digital Media vs. Conventional Media: Effectiveness of Learning in Primary Education. Pedagogik Journal of Islamic Elementary School, 750–766. https://doi.org/10.24256/pijies.v8i2.7762
Nagarajan, A., & Sen, A. (2022). Can Bloom’s Higher Order Thinking skills be achieved by Gamified Learning through Social Networking Site (SNS) like Facebook? Interaction Design and Architecture(S), 53, 144–160. https://doi.org/10.55612/s-5002-053-007
Ng, D. T. K., Leung, J. K. L., Su, J., Ng, R. C. W., & Chu, S. K. W. (2023). Teachers’ AI digital competencies and twenty-first century skills in the post-pandemic world. Educational Technology Research and Development, 71(1), 137–161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10203-6
Nguyen, V. T. T., & Chen, H.-L. (2023). Examining impacts of information system success and perceived stress on students’ self-regulated learning mediated by intrinsic motivation in online learning environments: second-order structural equation modelling analyses. Education and Information Technologies, 28(10), 12945–12968. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11685-w
Noguera Fructuoso, I., Albó, L., & Beardsley, M. (2022). University students’ preference for flexible teaching models that foster constructivist learning practices. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 38(4), 22–39. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.7968
Nuci, K. P., Tahir, R., Wang, A. I., & Imran, A. S. (2021). Game-Based Digital Quiz as a Tool for Improving Students’ Engagement and Learning in Online Lectures. IEEE Access, 9, 91220–91234. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3088583
Oyarzun, B., & Martin, F. (2023). A Systematic Review of Research on Online Learner Collaboration from 2012–21: Collaboration Technologies, Design, Facilitation, and Outcomes. Online Learning, 27(1). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v27i1.3407
Peykani, P., Namazi, M., & Mohammadi, E. (2022). Bridging the knowledge gap between technology and business: An innovation strategy perspective. PLOS ONE, 17(4), e0266843. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0266843
Permadi, M. A. M. Muzhaffar, & Sya’ban, WKSH (2025). Analisis perbandingan sistem pengajaran pesantren tradisional dan modern di Indonesia. Journal of Islamic Transformation and Education Management, 2(1), 25-31.
Permadi, M. A. M., & Sya'ban, W. K. (2025). T Transformasi Pendidikan Islam: Studi Komparatif Sistem Pengajaran di Pesantren Tradisional dan Pesantren Modern: Transformasi Pendidikan Islam: Studi Komparatif Sistem Pengajaran di Pesantren Tradisional dan Pesantren Modern. Transformation of Islamic Management and Education, 2(1), 18-24.
Permadi, M. A. M., Syaban, W. K., Habibi, M. I., Purnama, F., & Ampera, S. (2026). The Dynamics Of Learning Difficulties Among Students At Islamic Boarding Schools In The Digital Age: Between Tradition And Technological Limitations. Al-Ulum: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 7(1), 202-218.
Permadi, M. A. M., & Hilalludin, H. (2025). Reaktualisasi Hukum Islam Dalam Menjawab Tantangan Moderasi Beragama Di Era Globalisasi. IMANU: Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradaban Islam, 1(03), 29-40.
Scheel, L., Vladova, G., & Ullrich, A. (2022). The influence of digital competences, self-organization, and independent learning abilities on students’ acceptance of digital learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19(1), 44. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-022-00350-w
Schneider, S., Beege, M., Nebel, S., Schnaubert, L., & Rey, G. D. (2022). The Cognitive-Affective-Social Theory of Learning in digital Environments (CASTLE). Educational Psychology Review, 34(1), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09626-5
Schnell, Z., & Podeschi, C. (2022). A novel methodology of international discourse: online joint course across cultures. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 9(1), 216. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01233-1
Schorn, A. (2022). Online explainer videos: Features, benefits, and effects. Frontiers in Communication, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2022.1034199
Suharsimi Arikunto. (2013). Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Rineka Cipta.
Sutherland, K., Brock, G., de Villiers Scheepers, M. J., Millear, P. M., Norman, S., Strohfeldt, T., Downer, T., Masters, N., & Black, A. L. (2024). Non-traditional students’ preferences for learning technologies and impacts on academic self-efficacy. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 36(2), 298–319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-023-09354-5
Tani, M., Manuguerra, M., & Khan, S. (2022). Can videos affect learning outcomes? Evidence from an actual learning environment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 70(5), 1675–1693. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-022-10147-3
Terzieva, V., Bontchev, B., Dankov, Y., & Paunova-Hubenova, E. (2022). How to Tailor Educational Maze Games: The Student’s Preferences. Sustainability, 14(11), 6794. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14116794
Tetzlaff, L., Schmiedek, F., & Brod, G. (2021). Developing Personalized Education: A Dynamic Framework. Educational Psychology Review, 33(3), 863–882. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09570-w
Udeozor, C., Russo-Abegão, F., & Glassey, J. (2023). Perceptions and factors affecting the adoption of digital games for engineering education: a mixed-method research. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-022-00369-z
Vodă, A. I., Cautisanu, C., Grădinaru, C., Tănăsescu, C., & de Moraes, G. H. S. M. (2022). Exploring Digital Literacy Skills in Social Sciences and Humanities Students. Sustainability, 14(5), 2483. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14052483
Walkington, C., Nathan, M. J., Huang, W., Hunnicutt, J., & Washington, J. (2024). Multimodal analysis of interaction data from embodied education technologies. Educational Technology Research and Development, 72(5), 2565–2584. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10254-9
Wohlfart, O., & Wagner, I. (2023). Teachers’ role in digitalizing education: an umbrella review. Educational Technology Research and Development, 71(2), 339–365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-022-10166-0
Wong, A. K. C., Hung, T. T. M., Bayuo, J., & Wong, F. K. Y. (2023). The development and implementation of a blended video watching and peer learning model for master’s nursing students: a quasi-experimental study. BMC Nursing, 22(1), 62. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-023-01204-0
Yeung, A. W. K., Parvanov, E. D., Hribersek, M., Eibensteiner, F., Klager, E., Kletecka-Pulker, M., Rössler, B., Schebesta, K., Willschke, H., Atanasov, A. G., & Schaden, E. (2022). Digital Teaching in Medical Education: Scientific Literature Landscape Review. JMIR Medical Education, 8(1), e32747. https://doi.org/10.2196/32747
