Efektivitas Pemenuhan Nafkah Anak Pasca perceraian Di Pengadilan Agama Palu Kelas Ia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59944/amorti.v4i4.1405Keywords:
child maintenance, divorce, legal effectiveness; maqaṣid al-shariahAbstract
Divorce terminates the marital relationship but does not end parental responsibility for children. This study examines the effectiveness of post divorce child maintenance at the Palu Religious Court Class IA, identifies the factors that obstruct its implementation, and formulates a strengthening model oriented toward children’s best interests. The study employed a descriptive qualitative design. Data were obtained through semi-structured interviews with six purposively selected informants one judge, one court registrar, two heads of Religious Affairs Offices, and two parents affected by divorce supported by document review and observation. Data were analysed through reduction, categorisation, interpretation, and source triangulation. The findings reveal three implementation patterns: regular payment, irregular payment, and complete non-payment. Court judgments have provided a formal legal basis, yet substantive effectiveness remains weak because payment still depends largely on fathers’ voluntary compliance. The principal barriers are weak parental responsibility, unstable income, post-divorce communication conflict, passive post-judgment supervision, and limited access to enforcement. The study also identifies a kinship-buffer paradox: extended families protect children when fathers fail to pay, but their assistance can unintentionally normalise paternal non-compliance and shift the economic burden to the maternal family. Strengthening implementation therefore requires operational court orders, child-focused co-parenting communication, extended-family mediation that does not replace paternal responsibility, and accessible enforcement procedures. These measures accord with maqāṣid al-syarī‘ah by protecting children’s life, intellect, lineage, property, and dignity
This is an open-access article under the CC–BY-SA license.
References
Ahadi, L. M. A. (2022). Efektivitas hukum dalam perspektif filsafat hukum: Relasi urgensi sosialisasi terhadap eksistensi produk hukum. Jurnal Usm Law Review, 5(1), 110–127.
Auda, J. (2008). Maqasid Al-Shariah. An Introductory Guide (USA: International Institute of Islamic Thought, 2008).
Al Kautsar, I., & Muhammad, D. W. (2022). Sistem hukum modern Lawrence M. Friedman: Budaya hukum dan perubahan sosial masyarakat dari industrial ke digital. Sapientia et Virtus, 7(2), 84–99.
Ansari, Ansari. “LEGAL CERTAINTY OF THE JUDGE’S DECISION ON THE FATHER’S OBLIGATION TO PROVIDE FOR CHILDREN AFTER DIVORCE.” In International Conference on Humanity Education and Society (ICHES), Vol. 3, 2024.
Aprillia, Ade. “Faktor Penyebab Tidak Terlaksananya Pemenuhan Hak Nafkah Anak Oleh Orang Tua.” Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa 6 (2024)
Azizi, A. Q. (2016). Jaminan Hak Nafkah Anak dalam Hukum Keluarga Islam di Indonesia. Program Pasca Sarjana UIN Sunan Kalijaga.
Brank, E. M., Kucera, J. M., & Woolard, J. L. (2012). The historical, jurisprudential, and empirical wisdom of parental responsibility laws. Social Issues and Policy Review, 6(1), 26–53.
Darmawan, Aldy. “Pemenuhan Nafkah Anak Pasca Perceraian.” Sakena: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga 7, no. 1 (2022).
Djaoe, A. N. M. (2025). Hak dan Kewajiban dalam Perkawinan. Hukum Keluarga: Perspektif Kontemporer, 38.
Fachreza, A. K. (2025). Pertimbangan hakim di Pengadilan Agama Sampang dalam memutus perkara isbat Nikah Kontensius perspektif teori efektivitas hukum lawrence M. Friedman. Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim.
Fahrezi, A., & Diana, R. (2019). Pola Asuh Co-Parenting Dan Penyesuaian Diri Pada Remaja dengan Orangtua Bercerai (Broken Home). Wacana, 11(2), 196–212.
Fauzan, A. (2024). Jaminan Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Putusan Anak. Syakhshiyyah Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam, 4(1), 108–132.
Harasyid, H., & Ramadhani, K. (2024). Maqasid al-Syariah dalam Menjawab Tantangan Keluarga Modern di Indonesia. HUKUMAH: Jurnal Hukum Islam, 1(1), 88–101.
Hariaji, A., & Yulianis, M. S. F. (2025). Perlindungan hukum terhadap perempuan dan anak dalam perkara perceraian di Pengadilan Agama. Jurnal Sains, Ekonomi, Manajemen, Akuntansi dan Hukum, 2(3), 166–179.
Khair, U. (2020). Pelaksanaan hak asuh anak setelah terjadinya perceraian. JCH (Jurnal Cendekia Hukum).
Khalaif, L. N. (2024). Efektivitas Lembaga Mediasi Dalam Menekan Angka Perceraian Di Pengadilan Agama Palu Klas 1A. Universitas Islam Negeri Datokarama Palu.
Muhammad Syaifuddin, S. H., Sri Turatmiyah, S. H., & Annalisa Yahanan, S. H. (2022). Hukum perceraian. Sinar Grafika.
Muizzudin, A. H., & Anwar, M. W. (2023). Tinjauan Yuridis Relevansi Pasal 41 Huruf a Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 Dan Pasal 105 Kompilasi Hukum Islam Tentang Hak Asuh Anak Pasca Perceraian. Al-Akmal: Jurnal Studi Islam, 2(1), 50–62.
Mulyana, I. (2022). Keistimewaan peran ayah dalam pengasuhan anak. CV Jejak (Jejak Publisher).
Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. Sage.
Pakarti, M. H. A., Farid, D., Fathiah, I., & Mabruri, K. A. K. (2023). Perlindungan Hak Anak Dalam Perceraian Menurut Hukum Keluarga Islam. Usroh: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam, 7(2), 14–36.
Safitri, D. A., & Ahmad, M. J. (2024). TANGGUNGJAWAB ORANGTUA ATAS NAFKAH ANAK PASCA PERCERAIAN. COURT REVIEW: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum (e-ISSN: 2776-1916), 4(06), 38–59.
Somantri, G. R. (2005). Memahami metode kualitatif. Makara Human Behavior Studies in Asia, 9(2), 57–65.
Syahrin, M. A., & SH, M. H. (2022). Eksekusi putusan pengadilan agama tentang nafkah anak di Indonesia. Deepublish.
Zuhaili, W., & al-Islami, U. F. (n.d.). Damaskus: Dar al-Fikr, 1986. Cet. Ke-1.
Zuḥaylī, W. (2003). al-Fiqh al-Islāmī wa Adillatuhu. Dār al-Fikr al-Mouaser.
